Conveyor Reviews, Pricing, and Alternatives for Security Questionnaires (February 2026)

If you're comparing Conveyor alternatives, you've probably already noticed the static knowledge base problem. Your security posture changes, certifications renew, product features ship, but your Q&A library stays frozen until someone manually updates it. That manual maintenance becomes a full-time job when you're handling 200+ security questionnaires annually. We'll cover how Conveyor works, where teams run into limitations, and which tools offer self-maintaining knowledge bases that actually keep pace with your documentation.

TLDR:

• Conveyor suggests answers you copy-paste; teams want tools that auto-fill questionnaires.
• Static knowledge bases require manual updates when security posture or certs change.
• Credit-based pricing creates capacity planning issues for high-volume teams.
• Vanta and Drata bundle questionnaire features with compliance automation you may not need.
• Wolfia auto-fills 200+ security questionnaires monthly with no caps or per-questionnaire fees.

Conveyor is a GPT-powered security questionnaire automation tool that launched in 2022, targeting mid to large organizations dealing with vendor security reviews. The company raised $12.5 million in Series A funding to build AI that helps teams handle security questionnaires faster.

The workflow is straightforward. You upload existing Q&A pairs and security documentation into a knowledge base. When a new security questionnaire arrives, Conveyor's AI searches that content library and drafts suggested answers based on what you've uploaded. You review and edit before sending.

Conveyor offers a browser extension for filling web-based portals like OneTrust or ServiceNow. The tool pulls from your knowledge base and populates fields as you work through questionnaires in your browser.

They also provide a trust center feature where prospects can access your security documentation, compliance certs, and policies without emailing your team. This self-serve approach can reduce inbound security questions during sales cycles.

Conveyor targets companies handling 100+ security questionnaires annually, with pricing that scales based on questionnaire volume and team size.

Conveyor works well for teams handling moderate questionnaire volume and want a trust center for prospect self-service. The browser extension makes sense if your security reviews happen mostly in web portals.

Several limitations push teams to look elsewhere. The Q&A pair architecture stays static. You upload questions and answers into Conveyor's knowledge base, and that content stays frozen until you manually update it. When your security posture changes, certifications renew, or product features ship, your knowledge base falls behind. Teams spend substantial time keeping their Q&A library current or risk sending outdated answers.

The credit-based pricing model creates capacity planning headaches. Each questionnaire consumes credits based on the number of questions. High-volume teams hit credit limits mid-quarter and either slow down responses or pay for top-ups.

Complex Excel questionnaires with merged cells, macros, or unusual formatting often break Conveyor's auto-fill. You end up manually copying suggested answers into the actual spreadsheet, which removes the automation benefit.

If you're processing 200+ security questionnaires annually, dealing with heavy Excel workbooks, or tired of babysitting your knowledge base to keep it fresh, you'll want to look at tools built for high-volume questionnaire automation with self-maintaining content libraries.

When evaluating Conveyor competitors, consider whether you need pure questionnaire automation or a broader GRC tool with questionnaire features bundled in.

We built Wolfia to auto-fill entire security questionnaires across Excel, PDF, Word, and web portals. Our Portal Agent handles 45+ vendor assessment portals end-to-end, including OneTrust, ServiceNow, Zip, Ariba, Coupa, and Prevalent. No copying and pasting.

The knowledge base updates itself. When your documentation changes, Wolfia refreshes answers automatically. Every response includes source citations, so you see exactly where each answer came from. Our legal review module redlines security addenda and flags problematic contract clauses based on your standards.

We charge one flat rate with no questionnaire caps or trust center limits. Best for teams processing 200+ security questionnaires annually who need questionnaire completion, not just answer suggestions.

Vanta started as a compliance automation tool and added questionnaire features later. You get compliance monitoring and security questionnaire help in one subscription. Works well if compliance automation is your primary need and questionnaires are secondary. Their questionnaire tool suggests answers you copy into spreadsheets rather than auto-filling documents.

Similar to Vanta, Drata built compliance automation first. Questionnaire features arrived later as an add-on. Best for teams who need SOC 2 automation and want basic questionnaire help bundled in. Per-questionnaire pricing can get expensive at high volumes.

SafeBase focuses on trust centers and security portals for prospect self-service. Strong choice if reducing inbound security questions matters more than questionnaire automation. Their questionnaire capabilities are limited compared to dedicated automation tools.

Here's how the top Conveyor alternatives stack up on features that matter for high-volume questionnaire automation.

Vanta and Drata bundle questionnaire features with compliance automation. You're paying for SOC 2 monitoring whether you need it or not. SafeBase started with trust centers, so questionnaire automation is secondary. Conveyor's credit system means you're constantly tracking capacity. Wolfia was built for teams filling hundreds of security questionnaires who need tools that scale without usage anxiety or hidden caps.

Conveyor works if you want a trust center with questionnaire help on the side. We built Wolfia for teams where questionnaire volume and accuracy are the priority, not an afterthought.

Our knowledge base updates itself when your documentation changes, so you're never sending stale answers. You process unlimited security questionnaires at one flat rate without tracking credits or hitting caps mid-quarter. The Portal Agent fills 45+ vendor assessment portals end-to-end, including OneTrust, ServiceNow, Zip, and Ariba. Every answer includes source citations so reviewers see exactly where information came from.

When your team handles 200+ security questionnaires annually and needs tools that scale without usage anxiety, purpose-built beats bolt-on every time. Wolfia customers report same-day turnaround on questionnaires that used to take 5-7 days. Your team reviews AI-generated responses instead of writing from scratch, cutting review time by 70-80% while maintaining accuracy. No token counting, no surprise overage charges, no workflow gaps when vendor portals require manual entry.

Your choice between Conveyor reviews and competitors comes down to whether questionnaire automation is your primary need or an add-on feature bundled with compliance monitoring. Tools built for compliance first treat security questionnaires as an afterthought, which shows up in manual workflows and per-questionnaire pricing that gets expensive fast. Wolfia processes unlimited security questionnaires at one flat rate because we started with high-volume automation as the core product, not a feature request three years after launch. Grab time on our calendar to walk through how the Portal Agent fills vendor assessment portals end-to-end while maintaining answer accuracy with self-updating knowledge bases.

Look for alternatives if you're processing 200+ security questionnaires annually, hitting credit limits mid-quarter, or spending excessive time manually updating your knowledge base. Teams dealing with complex Excel questionnaires that break Conveyor's auto-fill also benefit from switching to tools built for high-volume automation.

Focus on whether the tool auto-fills questionnaires or just suggests answers you copy-paste, how the knowledge base updates (manual vs. self-maintaining), and pricing structure (per-questionnaire vs. flat rate). Portal automation that handles OneTrust, ServiceNow, and other vendor portals end-to-end saves the most time.

Yes. Vanta and Drata bundle questionnaire features with SOC 2 compliance automation, so you pay for monitoring whether you need it or not. Wolfia and Conveyor focus solely on security questionnaire automation and trust centers, letting you avoid paying for compliance features your team doesn't use.

Credit systems force you to track capacity constantly and risk running out mid-quarter when questionnaire volume spikes. Each questionnaire consumes credits based on question count, creating budget uncertainty and either slowing response times or requiring emergency top-ups during busy periods.

Browser extensions help you fill fields faster while working in vendor portals, but you still manually navigate each page and field. Portal agents log into platforms like OneTrust, ServiceNow, or Ariba and complete the entire questionnaire end-to-end without human intervention, eliminating all manual work.