Wolfia vs Conveyor: Which Security Questionnaire Tool Wins? (February 2026)

You're researching Wolfia vs Conveyor because manual Q&A pair maintenance is killing your team's productivity. Every time your security posture changes, someone needs to hunt through the knowledge base and update affected entries one by one. That's the core difference worth understanding: one tool requires you to manually keep answers fresh, the other syncs with your existing documentation automatically.

TLDR:

• Wolfia auto-fills questionnaires and syncs with your docs automatically; Conveyor needs manual Q&A uploads
• Conveyor charges per trust center visit and caps questionnaires; Wolfia includes everything unlimited
• Wolfia adds portal questions to your knowledge base; Conveyor treats each assessment as standalone work
• Wolfia cites sources for every answer to prevent hallucinations that break trust in AI tools
• Wolfia auto-syncs with Notion, Drive, Confluence, and Slack to keep answers current without manual updates

Conveyor is a security questionnaire automation tool built around a Q&A matching system. You manually upload question-answer pairs to create a knowledge base, then Conveyor scans incoming questionnaires and suggests matches from that library.

The product includes a browser extension for filling questionnaires directly in web portals like OneTrust or ServiceNow. You review suggested answers from your knowledge base and click to insert them into forms.

Conveyor also provides a trust center where prospects can access security documentation without emailing your team. This feature runs on a credit-based model where trust center access counts against your plan's usage limits.

The workflow requires ongoing manual maintenance. As your security posture changes or new questions appear, you need to update your Q&A pairs to keep answers accurate.

Wolfia automates security questionnaires by syncing with your existing documentation in Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, and Slack. No manual uploads or Q&A pair entry required.

When questionnaires arrive in Excel, PDF, Word, or web portals, Wolfia auto-fills responses with source citations showing exactly where each answer came from. Your team sees the originating document or Slack thread before anything goes to customers.

The Portal Agent works differently than browser extensions. Open OneTrust or ServiceNow, and the agent pulls all questions into our review interface. You see proposed answers with sources, make edits, then push everything back in one batch.

We include a free Trust Center for prospect self-service and a legal review module that redlines security addenda based on your standards. No questionnaire caps or usage limits.

Conveyor requires you to manually create and update Q&A pairs. You type question-answer combinations into the system, then revisit that library whenever security posture changes. When compliance requirements shift or policies update quarterly, someone logs in and edits each affected pair individually.

This creates accuracy problems over time. Teams report knowledge bases becoming so outdated that incorrect information makes them hesitant to trust the tool. The gap between your knowledge base and reality widens, and prospects viewing your trust center see stale answers.

Wolfia syncs weekly with Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, SharePoint, Slack, and your website. When source documents update, the knowledge base reflects those changes automatically. No manual Q&A pair editing required.

Override rules let you instantly correct information across the entire knowledge base without hunting through individual entries. The knowledge graph weighs recently updated policies higher than older whitepapers, pulling from fresher sources first.

Conveyor's AI matching system has accuracy problems. G2 reviews report the tool "slow or completely freezes up" with urgent security questionnaires, forcing teams to "come back to it later in the day." Users consistently flag "Inaccurate Responses" as a major complaint.

The problem is simple: accuracy depends on how closely new questions match your existing Q&A pairs. Change the phrasing slightly and the system suggests wrong answers or misses relevant ones entirely. Teams review every AI-generated response manually because they can't trust the output.

Wolfia runs 10+ hallucination prevention guardrails before showing you an answer. Every response includes source citations linking to the exact document and sentence. The AI won't convert "some customers" to "all customers" or fabricate statistics.

76% of enterprises now include human verification to catch hallucinations. Wolfia builds this into the workflow with confidence scores that flag answers needing review. Wolfia Expert provides industry-standard benchmark answers when your documentation doesn't cover a topic yet.

Conveyor uses a credit-based pricing model where features and access are gated by tier. The Free plan includes 10 trust center credits per month, max 15 documents, max 15 Q&As, no AI answers, no browser extension, no CRM integrations, and no access groups.

Professional tier starts at $9,600+ annually with 100 trust center credits and 20 questionnaire credits covering 100 questions each. One credit equals one organization accessing your trust center. When credits run out, prospects can't view your materials until you buy more. Salesforce integration requires the Advanced tier, not Professional.

Wolfia includes everything with no credits to track. CRM integrations, analytics, unlimited customer visits, API access, and questionnaire automation come standard. No per-seat fees. Adding reviewers from legal, security, or sales doesn't change your cost.

Conveyor works for low-volume teams with predictable access patterns. Wolfia fits better when you're scaling security reviews or pursuing enterprise deals where trust center traffic fluctuates.

Conveyor's browser extension fills portal questionnaires one question at a time inside OneTrust, ServiceNow, or similar interfaces. You review a suggested answer, insert it, then move to the next question. There's no centralized view to review all responses before submission.

The bigger problem: portal questions never improve your knowledge base. Conveyor has no mechanism to capture what you learn from these questionnaires. Each portal assessment remains standalone work instead of making future responses easier.

Our Portal Agent pulls questions from OneTrust, ServiceNow, Zip, and 45+ other portals into the Wolfia review interface. You see all proposed answers with sources, edit what needs changing, approve responses, and push everything back in one batch. Every approved answer gets added to your knowledge base automatically.

Portal questionnaires stop being repetitive work and start building institutional knowledge instead.

Conveyor relies on manual CSV uploads. You export Q&A pairs from spreadsheets, then import them on whatever schedule your team can manage. The browser extension connects to portals like OneTrust, but it won't pull from your documentation or update answers when files change.

Salesforce integration lives behind a paywall on the Advanced tier. Professional plans can't link security reviews to pipeline data or track which deals are waiting on questionnaires.

Wolfia syncs directly with Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, SharePoint, Slack, and your website. Weekly syncs mean changes propagate automatically. Last-modified timestamps show which answers reflect current policies versus outdated materials.

Salesforce integration ships standard on every plan. The Slack Agent answers security questions in channels where sales teams already work. API access lets you build custom workflows without switching tools.

Conveyor works for teams with low questionnaire volumes who can dedicate time to manual Q&A library maintenance. If your security policies stay static for quarters at a time and you're comfortable managing credit allocations for trust center access, the approach is workable.

Wolfia fits better for most organizations because it solves the staleness problem that breaks Conveyor deployments. Once your team encounters outdated information in the knowledge base, trust collapses. You stop relying on the tool and revert to manual work.

We built self-maintaining integrations that sync with your documentation automatically. Hallucination prevention guardrails keep answers grounded in reality. Source citations let reviewers verify facts instantly. Portal workflows add questions back to your knowledge base instead of treating each assessment as disposable work.

If you're handling 200+ questionnaires yearly, pursuing enterprise deals, or lack bandwidth for monthly knowledge base cleanup, Wolfia delivers measurable ROI faster. No credit tracking. No manual uploads. No accuracy anxiety before hitting send.

Most teams picking between Wolfia and Conveyor underestimate how much time manual Q&A maintenance consumes. Your security policies change quarterly at minimum. Conveyor requires someone to update each affected pair individually, while we pull from your living documentation in Notion, Drive, and Confluence automatically. Source citations show reviewers exactly where each answer originated. Schedule a walkthrough to see how we handle portal questionnaires and trust center traffic without usage limits.

Consider your security questionnaire volume and maintenance bandwidth. Conveyor works if you handle fewer than 50 questionnaires yearly and have time for monthly Q&A library updates. Wolfia fits better if you're processing 200+ questionnaires, pursuing enterprise deals, or need your knowledge base to stay current without manual editing.

Conveyor's browser extension fills portals one question at a time without capturing that work for future use. Wolfia's Portal Agent pulls all questions into a review interface, lets you approve answers in batch, then automatically adds those responses to your knowledge base so portal work compounds over time instead of staying repetitive.

Conveyor fits teams with static security policies, low questionnaire volumes, and capacity to manage credit-based trust center limits. Wolfia is built for B2B SaaS companies with 200+ questionnaires yearly, 1-2 person bottlenecks, and security postures that change quarterly when you can't afford outdated answers reaching prospects.

Wolfia runs 10+ hallucination prevention checks and cites the exact source document for every answer, so you can verify facts instantly rather than reviewing blind. Conveyor users report consistent accuracy problems because the matching system breaks when question phrasing changes, forcing manual review of everything anyway.

With Conveyor, someone logs in and manually edits each affected Q&A pair in your library. Wolfia syncs weekly with Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, SharePoint, and Slack, so knowledge base updates happen automatically when your source documents change without hunting through individual entries.