The deal landed a DPA on your desk. Get through the first pass without becoming the bottleneck.

Sales gets the verbal. Now there is a DPA, a data security exhibit, and the customer’s own security addendum in your queue. Two pages are tied to security policy. The clock is running on a deal that everyone else already considers closed.

What you actually want in that moment is not a tool. It’s progress: get through a defensible first pass fast, without becoming the person every deal waits on.

So you do the only thing you can: pull out the security-tied sections, drop them in a Slack thread or a Google Doc, and ping several people who each own a different policy. Then you wait. The deal slips while you chase responses, and you are the reason it slipped. That is the job Wolfia is hired for, and it’s the workflow one head of legal at a Wolfia customer described almost word for word.

• Functional: you are drafting the review from scratch when you should be reviewing one. "It involves Slacking normally a group of like five people, both because the information is spread out across different teams and bandwidth reasons."
• Functional: different people own different policies, so a two-page addendum turns into a multi-day coordination job before you can even start reviewing
• Emotional: you cannot be confident you have not missed risk when you are reading a blank doc. "They will just send me the underlying policy, and I am like, okay, this is what I actually just needed."
• Social: you are the queue every enterprise deal sits in, and the people downstream know it. It repeats on roughly every deal, week after week
• You went looking for help and it did not deliver progress: "we have now trialed five or six different legal tools and have not got to the point yet where we feel the value is there"

Your security and legal teams already share a knowledge base in Wolfia. The same SOC 2, the same policies, the same approved facts that auto-answer your security questionnaires also ground your first pass on a DPA. When security updates a policy or adds a manual override, you see it the same day. Legal and security stop maintaining two versions of the truth and stop discovering the gap mid-deal, in front of the customer.

• You open a cited first pass, not a blank doc, so you are reviewing within minutes instead of assembling for days
• You can defend every flag because each one links to the policy behind it, so you are confident you have not missed risk
• You bring security a triaged draft, so the initial round-trip with five policy owners is gone
• The deal keeps moving and you are seen as the team that enables it, not the queue it sits in
• Legal and security work off one corpus that stays current, so positions do not drift between deals

The legal review is newer than Wolfia’s security questionnaire product, which is in production at LILT, Amplitude, and Handshake. Today a design-partner legal team runs it on incoming addendums about once a week. Their read: it "definitely sped things along" and "leads to a quicker conversation with security," and they still consult security on each one. We are not going to tell you it replaces that review or gets you to "done." The job it does today is getting you out of the cold start, the manual section pull, and the wait for the first round of policy answers, and it gets better every time you feed a position back in.

The legal review shares Wolfia’s core engine: ingest documents in any format, ground every finding in your real corpus, cite every position, and route what it does not know to a human instead of guessing. The reason a customer legal team picked Wolfia over six-figure legal AI tools they had trialed was not better legal language. It was that "all the policies are already there," with the overrides and approved facts that keep them current. That is what makes the first pass one you can actually stand behind. See the product in detail: the Legal Review Agent.